Funding Puget Sound Restoration

The Puget Sound has been at the forefront of restoration. A recent report, "Action Agenda: Financing Strategy -- Estimates of Spending Related to Puget Sound," released by the Puget Sound Partnership, shows the complicated funding situation that projects such as this face. According to the report:

Current annual spending on Puget Sound protection and restoration is estimated  to be on the order of $564 million per year from the public sector.  The public sector also spends an estimated $799 million on wastewater treatment and $646 million on mitigation in Puget Sound. (page 4)

While this is encouraging, with so much money going towards a healthier Puget Sound, some interesting statistics do emerge:

The majority of public and private spending are in the form of permit-required mitigation and wastewater treatment.  Approximately 28% of public spending is on protection and restoration; overall less than one sixth of estimated public and private spending goes to this category. (page 4)

It would be nice if more money went to restoration activities. Of course, the money between these categories is not easily transferable, especially because decreased amounts of mitigation and wastewater treatment would not be beneficial to a clean Puget Sound. Nonetheless, the ecological benefits of restored ecosystems are established, and more money should go into it. Given the current economic situation, however, this most likely will not happen until significant economic growth resumes.

Also interesting in the study is a breakdown of to which areas of restoration the spending goes. While many of the categories are vague (for example, would road decommissioning be in "Stormwater," "Restore Habitat," or "Sediments"?), the chart still provides valuable information.

Overall, the Puget Sound Partnership's "Action Agenda: Financing Strategy -- Estimates of Spending Related to Puget Sound" is a valuable report for the depth of information that it gives. Please check out the report yourself, either directly through the Puget Sound Partnership, or through Wildlands CPR's Resource section.



Comments

Permitting of Puget Sound restoration projects

Just a question - Duplicate rules and layers of permitting regulations at the local, state, and federal level can impede projects, not to mention waste large sums of $$$ that are best spent on the ground. Does this problem exist for Puget Sound restoration/enhancement projects? Have steps been taken to streamline permitting review? Thanks. Curtis Kruer Sheridan, MT

To a certain degree, yes

Curtis -- The duplication in the various levels of permits most definitely is a problem in general for watershed restoration. While I have not worked on the ground in the Puget Sound, I imagine that it would hold true there. For large-scale projects, this is more of a nuisance than a major impediment -- it doesn't waste huge sums of money. It does waste money in terms of human resources, but the majority of money for these projects pays for heavy equipment and on-the-ground labor in the physical activities of restoration, not their administration. The primary means to get around this is either through agreements between local, state, and federal governments, such as the system that Sustainable Conservation has set up in California, or through categorical exclusions. The latter is more hotly debated, and no doubt must be limited to legitimate restoration activities, but at the same time the easiest to implement and most efficient.

Hope this helps,

Josh
Restoration Research Associate
Wildlands CPR

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
2 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.